VICE PRESIDENT RELEASES BOOK ‘WAR OF CIVILIZATIONS : INDIA AD 1857




The Vice President of India Shri Mohd. Hamid Ansari released the book titled “War of Civilizations: India AD 1857” –(Volume I -The Road to Delhi; & Volume II- The Long Revolution) authored by the writer/journalist Shri Amaresh Misra at a function here today. Addressing on the occasion, the Vice President said that writing such a voluminous book is an extraordinary success. Referring to the sources in the book he said that these sources are well-authenticated. He said that 1857 revolt was a revolution which failed because it was not sufficiently organized and many people did not join it. Congratulating the author the Vice President said that he has done a great service to the nation.

The book showcases a West, the West has never seen, an Asia which Asians are unaware of and a story of the ‘Indian Mutiny’ which has never been told before. The whole Asia-Europe conflict gets a new slant. Accessible to scholars, historians, lay readers, students of military adventure and battles, ideologies, action and drama, the story of 1857 resonates with smells and sounds of an Indian caravanserai, the auburn-gray picture of high sounding, Victorian England.

The author Shri Amaresh Misra gave a brief description of the book. Former Ministers Shri K. Natwar Singh and Shri Salman Khurshid also addressed. Many dignitaries were present on the occasion.

Comments

Vidyarathi said…
Please take note of a recent review in The Tribune, Chandigarh on Sunday, July 20, 2008 titled "Nationalistic uprising" URL is http://www.tribuneindia.com/2008/20080720/spectrum/book1.htm
22 July 2008 at 10:01
vinci said…
Hello,
I am a publisher of political books in the US. I would like to import a few copies of this work, or better yet, licence the set for publication in the US, resp. US-UK. Can you direct me to the copyright holder?
My website is progressivepress.com .
Thank you
JPL
28 November 2008 at 09:33
Vidyarathi said…
Hi JPL,

The book has been published by Rupa & co; this company can be approched at info@rupapublications.com. The website is www.rupapublications.co.in

Best wishes.
Ashok Malik
28 November 2008 at 23:30
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AN ALTERNATIVE NARRATIVE OF NATIONALISM

Image
Response to a debate: Hindus and Muslims did participate in the freedom movement under Gandhi and fought under one flag in post-independence wars. But never, never did they unite with reverence and respect for each other's religions as in 1857. The concept of religion in 1857 worked as a uniting, and not a divisive, force. Secondly, 1857 was the uprising of the peasantry. Even sepoys were all peasants. This is different from the Congress led freedom movement. Middle class, a product of the British education system, dominated the latter. 0 The men and women who fought in 1857 had roots in pre-British India of indigenous categories and practices. The same cannot be said of those who fought in the post-1857 phase. Where else but in 1857 will you find the Hindu religious peasantry going to Delhi to install a Muslim king? Where else will you find Muslim cavalry placing Nana Sahab Peshwa, a kattar Brahmin, on the throne of Kanpur? Apart from a brief perio...
Read more

Indian Express review 24th February 2008

Image
150 Years Later by Bibek Debroy This is a book of great courage and perseverance. Authoring a two-volume magnum opus of more than 2,000 pages, on any subject, is not easy. Amaresh Misra’s earlier books on Lucknow and Mangal Pandey establish his interest in events centred on 1857. The first volume is better written than the second. However, this is more than compensated by extensive research. There is also an interesting experiment in the first two chapters of the first volume (concerning Azimullah Khan and Azeezun Bai) of using the fiction genre to describe events. This works quite well, except that the reader can’t always distinguish fact from fiction. But this isn’t an experiment that is repeated subsequently. The Misra propositions can be segregated into a few strands. Some have been established fairly convincingly, others less so. First, the Mughal state came close to “establishing a mercantile industrial capitalism”, with the pressure for change emerging from a small town and rur...
Read more